Earlier we had given you information about the Xolo Q600 and Micromax A92 Canvas Lite, now we had brought for you a detailed comparison review of both these phones. The Xolo Q600 is packed with a Quad Core processor, 4.5 inch display and dual camera options. On the other side its competitor Micromax A92 Canvas Lite is a lighter device that is powered with a Dual core processor, 5 inch display. Micromax though had made good presence in the market with variety of good selling devices and this phone is another product from them. On the other side Xolo is somewhat newer brand in the Indian market and is trying to make an impact in the Indian market.
VS 
If you are thinking to buy any of the device among this two,this article will help you to choose best among them. Let us see the detailed comparison review among these two devices.
Display and Processor
The Xolo Q600 sports a 4.5 inch TFT FWVGA display, whereas the Micromax A92 Canvas Lite sports a larger 5.0 inch TFT IPS display. The screen resolution of the Q600 is 480 x 854 pixels whereas the A92 Canvas Lite has the screen resolution of about 480 x 854 pixels so both the devices have the same screen resolution. When it comes to the pixel density Q600 has the 217 PPI whereas the A92 Canvas Lite has the pixel density of 196 PPI. From the given specifications it is clear that the Xolo Q600 comes with the greater clarity as compared to the A92 Canvas Lite. As both the phones have same screen resolution, but the Q600 has smaller screen as compared to the Canvas Lite and also it has the greater pixel density, so clearly Q600 have better display than A92 Canvas Lite.
When it comes to the processor, Xolo Q600 is powered by 1.2 GHz MTK 6589M Cortex A7 based Quad Core processor. On the other side Micromax A92 Canvas Lite is powered with a less powerful 1 GHz dual processor. As from the specifications we can see that Q600 is a Quad Core device whereas Micromax A92 Canvas Lite is a Dual Core device and therefore there will be huge difference among the working of this devices, Xolo Q600 seems to run smoothly even with the larger apps and operations. Whereas Micromax A92 seems to be lagging with the larger apps. Both the devices have the same 512 MB of RAM so there is no difference among them, but Q600 with Quad Core processor seems to be a bit faster as compared to the Micromax A92 Canvas Lite So from this it is almost clear that Q600 comes with the greater processor as compared to the A92 Canvas Lite and has good performance among both the devices.
Camera and Memory
In the camera section, Xolo Q600 features a Dual camera option, it is packed with the 5.0MP auto focus primary camera with LED flash. It has 0.3MP of secondary camera at the front, that lets the user to enjoy the video calling option and LED flash will let the user to capture the images in the low light. On the other hand Micromax A92 Canvas Lite packs the 5.0MP auto focus primary camera with LED flash, but it does not have the secondary camera therefore no video calling option for the customers. From the given specifications it is clear that the Q600 has a dual camera whereas the Micromax A92 Canvas Lite comes with only a rear camera. Though both the devices have the same camera of 5.0MP, but the Q600 has the dual camera option and so this gives it an edge over the Micromax A92 Canvas Lite.
On the memory side, Xolo Q600 is packed with 4GB of onboard internal storage that can be expanded upto 32GB via microSD card. The Micromax A92 Canvas Lite is also packed with the same 4GB of internal memory that is expandable upto GB via 32 Micro SD card slot. So there is no such difference among both the devices when it comes to the memory.
Battery and Features
Again when we compare the battery size of both these devices both of them have the same 2,000 mAh battery, and so they will almost give the same battery backup, though as Xolo Q600 has greater hardware as compared to the Micromax A92 Canvas Lite, there is slight chance that A92 Canvas Lite will give better backup among both the devices. Company claims that Xolo Q600 can give up to 13.4 hours of talk time on 2G network and up to 10 hours of talk time on 3G, and a standby time of 333 hours. Micromax A92 Canvas Lite gives 6 hours of talk time and 240 hours of standby time on 2G network. Both devices can easily give the backup of about a day once fully charged. For the heavy users it might have the backup of more than 16 hours.
On the feature side Xolo Q600 has the options of 3G, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth and GPS for the connectivity. Xolo Q600 comes with a built-in security app for tracking the device remotely and a Swype-ready keyboard. Also the Xolo Q600 runs on the newer Android v4.2 Jelly Bean Operating system which adds newer features to the device and lets the UI of the device to be a fresher in look and feel. Micromax A92 Canvas Lite packs almost the same features, for connectivity it has 3G, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 4.0, GPS and USB support. It comes with the number of preloaded applications such as the social networking apps and instant messengers. For music options it comes with 3.5mm audio jack, FM Radio with recording. It also has G-Sensor, light sensor and proximity sensor. So from the given features both the devices seems to have the same feature and does not have any of the unique feature. Both the devices are the Dual SIM (GSM + GSM) with dual standby.
Key Specifications
| Model | Xolo Q600 | Micromax A92 Canvas Lite |
| Display | 4.5 inch TFT FWVGA display, with screen resolution of 480 x 854 pixels with 217 PPI | 5.0 inch TFT IPS display, with screen resolution of 480 x 854 pixels with 196 PPI |
| Processor | 1.2 GHz Quad Core Mediatek 6589M processor | 1 GHz Dual Core processor |
| RAM, ROM | 512 MB of RAM, 4GB of onboard internal storage,expanded upto 32GB via microSD card | 512 MB of RAM, 4GB of onboard internal storage,expanded upto 32GB via microSD card |
| Cameras | 5.0 MP auto focus Primary camera with LED flash, 0.3 MP of secondary camera at front | 5.0 MP of Primary camera with Auto Focus and LED flash, VGA secondary camera option |
| OS | Android v4.2 Jelly Bean | Android v4.1 Jelly Bean |
| Battery | 2000 mAh | 2000 mAh |
| Price | Rs. 8,999 | Rs. 8,499 |
Conclusion
From the above specifications and features we can state that the Xolo Q600 with Quad Core processor, dual camera options, greater screen clarity seems to have a greater edge over the Micromax A92 Canvas Lite. Though most of the other features in both the phones is almost same. The Xolo Q600 is available at the price tag of Rs. 8,999, whereas the Micromax A92 Canvas Lite is available at the price of Rs. 8,499. Though the Xolo Q600 is a bit costlier than the Micromax A92 Canvas Lite, but it has number of greater features than the A92 Canvas Lite. So from the given review it is clear that the Xolo Q600 wins the battle among both the devices.
